श्रीसनातन

The six Darśanas — the philosophies

षड्दर्शन

Also written: six darshanas · shad darshana · indian philosophy schools · astika darshana · nyaya vaisheshika samkhya yoga mimamsa vedanta · षड्दर्शन

Darśana means 'a seeing' — a way of viewing the whole. There are six orthodox systems, and they are not six chapters of one doctrine. They are six rival philosophies with different metaphysics, different logics and different accounts of freedom, preserved side by side for two thousand years because the tradition regarded the disagreement itself as valuable.

The six, at a glance
DarśanaFounder / root textCentral concernReality isLiberation is
NyāyaGautama — Nyāya SūtraLogic and the means of valid knowledgePlural, real, knowableCessation of suffering through true knowledge
VaiśeṣikaKaṇāda — Vaiśeṣika SūtraCategories of being; atomismMade of eternal atoms in six or seven categoriesThe self freed from contact with body and mind
SāṅkhyaKapila — Sāṅkhya KārikāEnumeration of the principles of existenceTwo: puruṣa (consciousness) and prakṛti (nature)Kaivalya — the isolation of consciousness from nature
YogaPatañjali — Yoga SūtraThe practical stilling of the mindAs in Sāṅkhya, plus ĪśvaraKaivalya, reached by the eight limbs
Pūrva MīmāṁsāJaimini — Mīmāṁsā SūtraDharma, and the authority of the Vedic injunctionReal, plural, eternal; the Veda is eternalOriginally heaven by right action; later, release
Uttara Mīmāṁsā (Vedānta)Bādarāyaṇa — Brahma SūtraBrahman, the Self, and their relationBrahman — variously non-dual, qualified, or dualKnowledge of Brahman; forms vary by school

What makes a darśana 'orthodox'

Āstika — usually translated 'orthodox' — means only that the school accepts the Veda as a valid means of knowledge. It does not mean belief in God. Sāṅkhya as classically stated has no creator; Pūrva Mīmāṁsā argues that a creator is unnecessary for its purposes; Vaiśeṣika's early form makes little use of one. All three remain āstika. The nāstika schools — Cārvāka, Buddhism and Jainism — are those that decline the Veda's authority, and they were engaged with in argument for two millennia rather than suppressed.

In this section

Nyāya — the science of right reasoning

Gautama's logic: the four means of knowledge, the sixteen categories, the five-membered syllogism, and why every Indian philosophical debate is conducted in Nyāya's vocabulary.

Vaiśeṣika — atoms and the categories of being

Kaṇāda's system: the indivisible atom, the six (later seven) categories of what exists, and the definition of dharma the whole tradition quotes.

Sāṅkhya — the enumeration of the principles

Puruṣa and prakṛti, the three guṇas, and the twenty-five tattvas: the oldest systematic philosophy of India, and the framework almost every other school borrowed.

Yoga — Patañjali's system

The Yoga Sūtra: 196 aphorisms in four pādas, the definition of yoga, the five kleśas, the eight limbs, and the difference between Patañjali's yoga and what the word now means.

Pūrva Mīmāṁsā — the philosophy of dharma and of language

Jaimini's system: injunction as the heart of the Veda, apūrva, the eternality of the word, and the rules of interpretation that the whole tradition — including its legal system — still uses.

Vedānta — the enquiry into Brahman

Uttara Mīmāṁsā: the three foundations, the central question of the relation between Brahman, the self and the world, and the schools that answered it differently.

The schools of Vedānta

Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, Dvaitādvaita, Śuddhādvaita and Acintya-bhedābheda — six readings of the same three texts, what each holds about the world and the soul, and the ācārya behind each.

Creation — as told by each of the six philosophies

Six systems, six different accounts of how the universe comes to be: atomic aggregation, the unfolding of prakṛti, the eternal Veda without a creator, Brahman appearing as the world, and the Ṛgveda's own refusal to settle it.

The nāstika schools — Cārvāka, Buddhism, Jainism

The three systems that decline the Veda's authority, what each holds, and why the orthodox tradition preserved their arguments at full strength instead of erasing them.


Continue reading

Last revised 2026-08-16. Corrections are welcome — see how this site is written.